During a Sunday interview, ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos and former President Trump’s attorney, Will Scharf, had a disagreement. They were discussing the former president’s claims that President Biden was involved in the hush money criminal case against Trump in New York, which have not been proven.
In an interview on “This Week,” Scharf repeatedly supported the claims of the former president. He argued that the hush money criminal trial, which resulted in Trump being found guilty of 34 felony counts, was a clear example of the legal system being influenced by politics.
“It has never happened before in American history.” This is not how our campaigns are supposed to be conducted. In this country, we participate in elections by voting, not by going to court,” Scharf continued.
Stephanopoulos agreed with Scharf’s argument about winning elections through voting, but emphasized that there is no evidence to suggest that the federal Department of Justice was involved in the recently concluded criminal trial in New York state.
Also Read: Get a Mortgage for an LLC Investment Property
“That is correct.” However, it is important to note that we have never had a former president or presidential candidate who has faced charges similar to the ones the current president is facing due to his own actions. “And, of course, the attorney general in Manhattan is not associated with the Department of Justice,” Stephanopoulos said.
As Stephanopoulos tried to change the subject back to his question about the sentencing process, Scharf continued to insist that the prosecution was politically motivated, refusing to give in. Stephanopoulos finally interrupted.
“I strongly disagree that the district attorney in New York was not politically motivated in this case,” Scharf said. “I also strongly disagree that President Biden and his political allies are not heavily involved in this prosecution.”
Stephanopoulos interrupted and said, “There is no evidence to support that.” Excuse me… I won’t allow you to keep saying that. There is absolutely no evidence of that. “Would you like to answer the question about the sentencing process or not?” Stephanopoulos said this, after some discussion.
Scharf mentioned that Matthew Colangelo, the prosecutor in the case, was present when District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced the verdict. Scharf saw this as evidence of political interference, noting that Colangelo used to work at the Department of Justice.
Leave a Reply