Quang Nguyen and Selina Bliss, two state representatives from Arizona, are in the news for their efforts to get Attorney General Kris Mayes to look into a Sedona firearms ban. The legal dispute focuses on whether Ordinance 12.30.090 of the City of Sedona, which prohibits guns on trails and open spaces, is in violation of Arizona’s gun laws. Nguyen and Bliss contend that the city’s action goes beyond state law, which limits local government’s authority over gun control, citing Arizona Revised Statutes 13-3108.
In a letter to the Attorney General, the two have demanded that Sedona’s ordinance be reviewed, arguing that the terms “trail” and “open space area” are ambiguous and cast a wider net than is allowed by law. To address this misunderstanding, they have asked Mayes to provide a written report within the legally required 30-day period. According to the State Capitol in Phoenix, they have also suggested judicial involvement if required to protect Second Amendment rights.
The House Judiciary Committee’s head, Representative Nguyen, said, “The City of Sedona has had ample time to address these concerns and has chosen not to act.” The two lawmakers have stated unequivocally that if Sedona repeals the legislation on its own initiative, no other steps will be required. According to the State Capitol in Phoenix, this development follows a month in which the City has failed to address Nguyen’s earlier concerns, challenging the limits of state and municipal governance with regard to gun regulations.
Since striking a balance between public safety and constitutional rights is never easy, a legislation like Sedona’s puts lawmakers and municipal governments in a challenging position. The continuous argument between state and local authority is exemplified by this circumstance. Attorney General Mayes’s handling of the matter and whether state law upholds or overturns Sedona’s gun-free zones will be closely watched since Second Amendment rights are at stake.
Note: Thank you for visiting our website! We strive to keep you informed with the latest updates based on expected timelines, although please note that we are not affiliated with any official bodies. Our team is committed to ensuring accuracy and transparency in our reporting, verifying all information before publication. We aim to bring you reliable news, and if you have any questions or concerns about our content, feel free to reach out to us via email. We appreciate your trust and support!
Leave a Reply