A federal judge in Delaware on Mondaytossedalawsuitfiled by former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee against social media giant Meta claiming that the platform unfairly profited from false advertisements for CBD products.
Huckabee, President-elect Donald Trump s nominee to be U.S. ambassador to Israel, sued Meta in July over a series of ads for CBD gummies. CBD gummies are edible candies that contain cannabidiol, or CBD one of the main active ingredients in marijuana. CBD alone does not produce a high.
Huckabee, a Republican, said in his complaint that he is a nationally recognized politician and political commentator who has spent years cultivating his credibility and image, and that a number of ads ran on Facebook and Instagram that falsely claimed he was suffering from health problems and had found a greater purpose in using and endorsing CBD gummies to replace opioids and painkillers.
One such ad, which was included in Huckabee sfiling, can be seen below.
Huckabee said he talked to numerous fans who, unfortunately, believed these advertisements were true and purchased the CBD products, because of the use of his name and likeness.
Meta, in turn, argued that it was immune from liability underSection 230 of the Federal Communication Decency Act. Section 230 shields platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube from liability stemming from user-created (or third-party) content that violates the law. Trump wasvocal about his distaste for Section 230throughout his presidency, andlobbied Congress to repeal the statute, claiming that such action was the remedy for discrimination against conservative viewpoints.
U.S. District Judge Gregory Williams, a Joe Biden appointee, rejected Meta s immunity claim on the grounds that Meta s decisions on ad placement and algorithms constituted its own first-party speech. However, despite the fact that Section 230 did not render Meta immune, Williams ruled that Huckabee s claims fail in their own right.
Specifically, the judge said that Huckabee failed to plead facts that show Meta knew the ads were fake. Even at the pleading phase, Williams found Huckabee s allegations lacking.
In his 15-page ruling, Williams quoted from Huckabee s complaint:
Williams wrote that none of these allegations allow the Court to draw the reasonable inference that Meta had the requisite scienter, ie. actual knowledge or awareness of facts or circumstances that could give rise to actual knowledge, and slammed Huckabee s argument as a mere conclusory statement.
Williams similarly rejected Huckabee s invasion of privacy claims for unauthorized use of his name and likeness and false light. The judge ruled that Huckabee s public denouncing of marijuana was not enough to create the reasonable inference that Meta entertained serious doubts about the ads. Likewise, Williams said there was not even an allegation that Meta was required to conduct due diligence on the truth of the ads and even had there been such an allegation, it would have failed.
Law&Crime reached out to counsel for the parties for comment, but did not immediately receive a response.
You can read the full rulinghere.
Have a tip we should know?[email protected]
Note: Thank you for visiting our website! We strive to keep you informed with the latest updates based on expected timelines, although please note that we are not affiliated with any official bodies. Our team is committed to ensuring accuracy and transparency in our reporting, verifying all information before publication. We aim to bring you reliable news, and if you have any questions or concerns about our content, feel free to reach out to us via email. We appreciate your trust and support!