Most Cities are At Risk During Nuclear War Including One In Kentucky

The prospect of nuclear war is a frightening possibility that fills many with fear. Despite the desire to avoid it, increasing tensions between nuclear-armed nations such as the US and Russia highlight the ongoing threat. Given the grim scenario, which cities in the US might be targeted, and are there potential risks in less expected locations such as Kentucky?

The Six Main Objectives

According to Irwin Redlener, a disaster preparedness expert from Columbia University, six major US cities are considered prime targets: New York, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Washington DC. These cities have important infrastructure such as financial centers, government buildings, and energy facilities, which can be appealing to adversaries seeking to cause significant damage and disorder.

Additional Possible Targets

Aside from these main targets, a map created using different data sources indicates that there may be other areas of interest. States such as Montana, North Dakota, Colorado, and Wyoming, with their intercontinental ballistic missile silos and military bases, might be considered strategic targets. Furthermore, states like Alabama, Arizona, Maryland, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee, which have operational nuclear plants, could also be at risk.

Also Read: Most US Cities are At Nuclear War Risk Including One in South Carolina

Discovering a Surprising City in Kentucky

Unexpectedly, Lexington, Kentucky is identified as a potential target. Lexington, the state’s second-largest city, is famous for landmarks such as the University of Kentucky and the Kentucky Horse Park. However, it also has a darker side. The Blue Grass Army Depot is home to a facility that stores chemical weapons and conventional munitions such as mustard gas, sarin, and VX nerve agent. Despite ongoing efforts to eliminate these weapons, the task is not projected to be finished until 2023. This leaves Lexington at risk of a secondary chemical disaster in the event of a nuclear conflict.

See also  Texas is Crawling With Bed Bugs and One City Among the Most Infected in the U.S.

Final Thoughts

Although the exact results of a nuclear conflict cannot be foreseen, some regions are considered more at risk due to potential situations and existing information. From bustling cities to remote areas with nuclear facilities, the range of risks varies greatly. Emphasizing diplomacy, cooperation, and disarmament is crucial to prevent nuclear disaster. Preparedness and awareness are essential for individuals to know which areas to avoid or evacuate in case of a disaster.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.