A federal court on Thursday denied a request by ABC News and George Stephanopoulos to push back some key dates and proceedings in Donald Trump’s defamation case against them.
In a four-page order, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida declined to reschedule several remaining deadlines related to expert witnesses, discovery, mediation, and various pretrial motions.
Rejecting the request, Chief U.S. District Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga said she was not convinced that attorney Nathan Siegel needed to travel to Israel for 18 specific days in April to observe Passover.
Currently, the trial is slated to begin on April 7, and is anticipated to last between three to five days. In the joint request for an extension of time, the parties suggested a new trial date of June 9.
From the shared motion, at length:
More Law&Crime coverage: ‘Get over the Passover. It was like 3,000 years ago.’: Transcripts show Rudy Giuliani making disparaging remarks about Jewish people, Matt Damon
The judge was not impressed with this excuse for can-kicking.
“Mr. Siegel’s proposed trip would interfere with the April 7 trial schedule,” Altonaga writes.
The court opined that with the trial likely to last a maximum of five days, Siegel would still have the ability to make it in time for the festival commemorating the Jewish people’s exodus from slavery under the Egyptian pharaohs.
“Mr. Siegel can still travel to Israel for Passover, as he wishes; and add additional time after Passover to be in Israel for the requested 18 days,” the judge wrote. “Consequently, Mr. Siegel’s suggested travel dates do not constitute good cause for the requested two-month continuance.”
In the motion, ABC News and Stephanopoulos made the request — buoyed by an affirmation by the attorney in question. Trump and his legal team, for their part, agreed — calling the request “appropriate to accommodate counsels’ ability to observe this religious holiday with [his] family.”
More Law&Crime coverage: Appeals court refuses to pause Trump’s Georgia case so defense lawyer can take ‘fully paid for and non-refundable’ international 70th birthday trip with his wife of 45 years
Notably, the court also rejected overtures for “a multi-month extension of each of the Scheduling Order’s remaining deadlines” based on shared concerns over “challenges presented by conducting discovery during the course of a Presidential campaign.”
Again, the judge was not having it.
“The unique challenges are not so obvious,” the order goes on. “In any event, the Court, has already granted a lengthy discovery period in light of these considerations and, with Election Day now behind us, there is no reason for any further delay.”
The President-elect is suing the defendants because Stephanopoulos said “more than 10 times” on “This Week” in March that Trump had been found “liable for rape” in the E. Jean Carroll civil case.
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
Note: Thank you for visiting our website! We strive to keep you informed with the latest updates based on expected timelines, although please note that we are not affiliated with any official bodies. Our team is committed to ensuring accuracy and transparency in our reporting, verifying all information before publication. We aim to bring you reliable news, and if you have any questions or concerns about our content, feel free to reach out to us via email. We appreciate your trust and support!