Red Flags: Pennsylvania's Top 5 Worst Residential Areas

Although Pennsylvania has a wide variety of communities, many regions have difficulties that may lower their standard of living.

This article examines Pennsylvania’s top 5 residential neighborhoods that are deemed less attractive based on variables such as overall well-being, economic opportunity, and crime statistics.

We’ll go into these places’ particulars and the potential problems that locals may have.

Clairton

At $135,357 for an average home and $41,301 for the typical income, Clairton is a small hamlet of 6,182 people. With an unemployment rate of 10.6%, the city does, nevertheless, face economic issues.

Although Clairton is a small city, 0.0606 crimes occur there per 1,000 residents, making it a modest crime rate. A municipality managing affordability and economic stability in the face of social issues is depicted in this nuanced image of statistics.

Duquesne

The population of the little town of Duquesne is 5,241 people. This town’s frugal housing market is reflected in the remarkably low average home price of $46,621.

Red Flags Pennsylvania's Top 5 Worst Residential Areas — Image By: Appily.com

Though there may be a discrepancy between local earning ability and housing prices, the median income is $40,969 despite this. The community may be facing economic difficulties, as seen by the comparatively high 7.8% unemployment rate.

Positively, Duquesne has a low crime rate—just 0.0606 offenses reported per 1,000 residents—which helps to explain why it’s known as a secure neighborhood.

Darby

There are 10,682 people living in the little town of Darby. The neighborhood is a reasonably priced place to live, as evidenced by the average home price of $109,626 in the area.

Nevertheless, despite the reasonably priced housing, the median income is $45,511, suggesting possible financial difficulties.

With a notable 13.9% jobless rate, the municipality appears to be experiencing persistent financial difficulties. Its low crime rate of 0.1069 incidents per person indicates a safe and relatively secure living environment for its citizens.

Corry

With an average property price of $136,071, Corry, a small town with 6,209 residents, has an inexpensive housing market. With a median income of $44,138, it reflects the socioeconomic makeup of its citizens.

Nonetheless, the municipality is facing difficulties, as seen by the high 10.5% unemployment rate. The comparatively low crime rate of 0.0283 incidents per capita indicates that residents live in a largely safe environment.

Folcroft

There are 6,758 people living in the little town of Folcroft. This location has a somewhat cheap housing market, as evidenced by the average property price of about $198,500.

With a median income of $56,650, the typical earning potential of its citizens is demonstrated. With a rather high unemployment rate of 10.2%, the town does, however, face difficulties.

With 0.1069 incidences per capita, crime is also a problem and suggests the need for community safety measures. With certain economic and safety concerns, Folcroft nevertheless offers reasonably priced home options and a stable residential environment despite these problems.

To Conclude

Although Pennsylvania has a diverse range of towns, there are some places where there is crime and economic hardship that can lower quality of life.

Although these five specific locales were highlighted in this post, it’s crucial to keep in mind that conditions can vary within these communities and that some locals may have had favorable experiences.

It takes consideration of a number of things to find the perfect area to reside. You can use this information as a starting point to make well-informed selections when thinking about these locations in Pennsylvania.

Do your homework on local neighborhoods and consider the amenities that each community has to offer before deciding on a final option.

Red Flags: Pennsylvania’s Top 5 Worst Residential Areas