The “Keystone State,” Pennsylvania, is well-known for its beautiful natural settings, fascinating history, and welcoming locals. Still, not every city inside its boundaries is a sunny, happy place.
Put down your hoagies for the time being, and get ready to discover why certain Pennsylvanian municipalities are frowning. Is it something else entirely, a lack of cultural opportunities, or a lack of economic opportunities?
Come along as we illuminate these frequently disregarded communities and the struggles they encounter.
Duquesne
There are major socioeconomic issues in Duquesne, a town of 5,280 people. With 28.3% of the population living below the poverty line, a sizable fraction of the population is affected by poverty in the area.
Given the region’s economic challenges, the typical property price of $51,000 is comparatively low.
Due to the extremely low percentage of married households (18.0%) and the high percentage of child-bearing homes (32.27%), it appears that a large number of Duquesne families are non-traditional or single-parent households.
Read Also: A Small Pennsylvania Town Has Suddenly Become the 3rd Most Dangerous in the State
Darby
There are 10,688 people living in the small town of Darby. With a poverty rate of 27.7%, it nevertheless confronts formidable socioeconomic difficulties in spite of its size.
Darby’s $81,800 typical home price illustrates how reasonably priced housing is in the neighborhood. The proportion of married households in the town is comparatively low, at 10.0%.
Furthermore, 36.91% of households are made up of families with children, a hint that a sizable section of the population is raising kids in the neighborhood.
These figures depict a close-knit community that struggles to support its citizens despite economic differences.
Read Also: Murder Capitals of Pennsylvania For 2024 Has Been Revealed
Collingdale
The population of 8,857 in Collingdale struggles with a 22.2% poverty rate. The location is affordable, as seen by the median property price of $120,500, even in the face of economic hardships.
In terms of household dynamics, families with children make up 30.76% of homes, whereas married couples make up 16.0% of the population. These figures depict a varied community whose members deal with both the pleasures and duties of family life in addition to financial difficulties.
Read Also: Must Check These Blackest Cities In Pennsylvania For 2024
Shamokin
There are 6,981 people living in the little Pennsylvanian town of Shamokin. Even with its small size, a sizeable chunk of the population—roughly 34.7%—faces poverty.
The very low $42,400 median property price in the town is a reflection of the financial difficulties that many people experience. Furthermore, just 24.0% of families are reported to be married, suggesting that the population may be temporary or single.
It’s interesting to note that, despite financial difficulties, families with children make up roughly 28.26% of homes, indicating a strong emphasis on family in this close-knit society.
Vandergrift
The town of Vandergrift is home to 5,065 people. The village struggles with a 19.4% poverty rate despite its tiny size, highlighting socioeconomic issues in the area.
The town’s housing affordability is reflected in the $69,400 median home price. Notable family dynamics include the presence of married couples in 34.0% of homes and families with children in 35.17% of households.
To Conclude
Pennsylvania’s “not-so-shining stars” confront a range of difficulties, from economic inequality in Duquesne to a possible lack of opportunity in Shamokin.
Numerous of these villages are characterized by indomitable spirits and strong sentiments of community. These cities provide unique experiences and the opportunity to be a part of something bigger, even though they might not be at the top of happiness lists.
You might find a hidden gem that is just waiting to be discovered if you dig deeper into the histories of these communities. This is just the beginning.
Leave a Reply