Garland’s suburbs attract a variety of individuals seeking a break from urban living. Some individuals may choose to reside in the cities and towns surrounding Garland to escape the busy atmosphere.
Do suburbs still capture the grandeur of their well-known neighbor? Today, we’ll be using Saturday Night Science to identify which neighborhoods in Garland could use some extra attention – the ones that stand out in the Garland area. Realistically, only a few suburbs can match the appeal of Garland itself, with University Park being a standout.
Not all suburbs of Garland are the same, so we went on a mission to discover the top ones. We analyzed the 67 largest suburbs of Garland to determine the least desirable places to reside. Although not commonly listed among the worst places to live in Texas, these 5 locations are situated quite far from Garland and may not offer the best quality of life.
- IRS Grants Extra Time for 2024 Taxes to Kentucky’s April Storm Survivors
- Fed’s June Meeting: Rate Cuts Not in the Cards: What’s Next?
- Deadline Alert: Michigan Schools Must Act Fast with Federal Stimulus Funds
- How to Access VA Dependent Education Benefits with a 100% Disability Rating
- Big News for SSDI: Social Security Might Add $600 to Payments
The Worst Garland Suburbs To Live
1. Hutchins
- Population: 5,613
- Median Income: $40,129 (lowest)
- Unemployment Rate: 8.3% (3rd highest)
- Median Home Value: $80,700 (2nd lowest)
Let’s start with Hutchins, which is considered the least desirable place to live near Garland based on the data. In the realm of lowest rankings, Hutchins outperformed the competition by scoring in the bottom 15% in three key categories. The income situation in the Garland area is quite poor, and to add to the challenge, the city ranks second lowest in terms of home values.
2. Seagoville
- Population: 18,263
- Median Income: $59,950 (8th lowest)
- Unemployment Rate: 7.3% (7th highest)
- Median Home Value: $162,800 (9th lowest)
The distance to Garland from this city is 18.4 miles. Income levels in this area rank 8th lowest in the metro region, with families earning around $59,950 annually, which may not stretch very far, even on a tight budget. On a positive note, there are numerous fast food restaurants nearby.
3. Balch Springs
- Population: 27,369
- Median Income: $55,817 (4th lowest)
- Unemployment Rate: 8.7% (2nd highest)
- Median Home Value: $153,600 (7th lowest)
Heading back up the highway to the third least desirable suburb in Garland. You may have been anticipating Balch Springs to be included in this list. Although the cost of living is affordable, your choices for entertainment and work are restricted. And that is putting it mildly.
When it comes to numbers, the insurance ranking is in the bottom 15%, and the adult high school dropout rate is lower than in other Garland suburbs.
Also Read: Listing 7 Most Worst Prisons in Entire America, Survey Finds
4. Wilmer
- Population: 5,064
- Median Income: $58,187 (6th lowest)
- Unemployment Rate: 3.1% (53rd highest)
- Median Home Value: $73,900 (lowest)
Living in Wilmer often means facing financial challenges each month. It is the 6th lowest suburb in Garland in terms of median household incomes. Furthermore, this suburb ranks as the 53rd worst in terms of unemployment if you decide to reside close to Garland. Just a reminder, we examined 67 cities for this study.
5. Combine
- Population: 2,721
- Median Income: $82,341 (25th lowest)
- Unemployment Rate: 6.8% (10th highest)
- Median Home Value: $202,900 (13th lowest)
Combine is known as a suburb of Garland. That’s pretty much its only positive aspect. Putting sarcasm aside, Combine ranks 13th for home values in the Garland metro area, with a median price of $202,900. The median income stands at $247,045. Combine has an unemployment rate of 6.81%, ranking it as the 10th worst.
Leave a Reply