The Bleakest Corners South Dakota's Most Miserable Cities Revealed

Huge grasslands, striking Black Hills mountains, and the recognizable Mount Rushmore are all associated with South Dakota. But not every part of South Dakota is sunny and picturesque.

We’ll look at a few South Dakota cities that are rated lower for livability and examine the factors that led to this assessment. Does this stem from a lack of employment prospects, restricted cultural offers, or something else entirely? To give you a complete picture of these cities, we’ll examine the data and user feedback.

Thus, this article can be a useful resource for you in determining which South Dakota communities best fit your lifestyle if you’re thinking about moving there.

Belle Fourche

There are about 5,561 people living in Belle Fourche, a small town in South Dakota. The community’s comparatively low poverty rate of 10.4%, which reflects a solid economic base, is maintained despite its tiny population.

Belle Fourche provides its residents with inexpensive housing alternatives, with a median property price of $151,500. This is a place where families are very strong; about 20.0% of homes are headed by a married couple, and 30.38% of households have children.

This figure highlights how appealing the town is as a family-friendly setting with a tight-knit community and high-quality lifestyle for its citizens.

Read Also: Check These Gayest Cities In South Dakota For 2024


With 2,108 residents, Springfield has a comparatively low rate of poverty (11.8%). With a median house price of $97,700, this neighborhood is reasonably priced for locals.

The Bleakest Corners South Dakota's Most Miserable Cities Revealed

It’s interesting to note that just 11.0% of families had married members, suggesting a variety of living situations. Despite the decreased percentage of married households, nearly a fifth of homes (17.9%) have children, indicating a family-friendly atmosphere.

Read Also: Exploring South Dakota Cities With The Highest Divorce Rates For 2024


The 2,433-person town of Sisseton is a community with both advantages and disadvantages. About one-fifth of its citizens, or 19.8%, live in poverty, which is a sign of economic inequality in the community.

In spite of this, the $92,100 median home price points to reasonably priced housing options that might provide stability for its occupants.

Family dynamics are important; married couples make up 24.0% of households, and families with children make up more than a third of all homes—34.65%.

Despite the financial challenges some may encounter, this number suggests a community culture that values family life and the raising of future generations.

Read Also: Visit These Most Welcoming South Dakota Towns If You Are There


Canton, a tiny village tucked away in the center of the municipality, is home to 3,054 people. It aims to keep the socioeconomic landscape balanced, with an 8.0% poverty rate.

The Bleakest Corners South Dakota's Most Miserable Cities Revealed

With a median home price of $149,100, the market for affordable housing is diversified and appeals to a wide range of consumers. With 33.0% of households having a married couple, family values are clearly present and contribute to the community’s feeling of stability and cohesion.

Furthermore, Canton values its youth, as seen by the fact that 35.77% of homes are endowed with children, who bring joy and vitality to the community and represent hope for the coming generations.


With 2,359 residents, Beresford is a tiny town with a low poverty rate of 4.5%, suggesting a stable economic climate. With a median house price of $171,000, the town retains a vibrant neighborhood despite its small size, drawing in purchasers looking for affordability and a sense of community.

In Beresford, where 33.0% of households are headed by a married couple, stability and family values are valued.

The town’s appeal as a family-friendly environment is further highlighted by the 35.35% of households in the town that have children, with amenities and resources catered to the needs of both parents and children.

To Conclude

For some residents, these towns may be the perfect place to live because of their affordable housing options, strong sense of community, and slower pace of life.

They could not have the facilities, employment prospects, or access to different cultures that others do. The ideal location for you to live ultimately depends on your personal priorities.

When you evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each place, take your lifestyle choices into account.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.